Hypothesis / aims of study
The Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) is a widely used tool in prostate cancer diagnostics, offering a standardized approach for evaluating multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) results. Despite its effectiveness, high PIRADS scores (4/5 or 5/5) that do not correlate with positive biopsy results present significant diagnostic challenges.
Study design, materials and methods
This retrospective cohort study included 40 patients from our institution with high PIRADS scores (4/5 or 5/5) but negative biopsy results. Patient data were analyzed to identify factors that may influence discrepancies between PIRADS scores and biopsy outcomes.
Interpretation of results
In this retrospective cohort study of 40 patients with elevated PIRADS 4/5 scores but negative prostate biopsies, no cases of malignancy were confirmed, even after repeat biopsies and further imaging. These findings suggest that benign conditions — particularly fungal prostatitis, granulomatous prostatitis, and prostate tuberculosis — can mimic the imaging features of prostate cancer and lead to false-positive PIRADS scores. Importantly, some patients responded to empirical antifungal therapy with fluconazole, supporting the hypothesis that fungal prostatitis may be an underrecognized contributor to elevated PSA and suspicious MRI findings.
The results highlight the need for greater clinical awareness of fungal prostatitis and suggest that its consideration could prevent unnecessary biopsies. Additionally, the findings underline the limitations of the current PIRADS system and support the potential benefits of integrating PSA density and exploring novel MRI contrast agents like mannitol to enhance diagnostic specificity.