Emerging Role of Drug-Coated Balloon Therapy in Female Urethral Stricture: A Scoping Review

Ullah W1, Ghani A1, Qamar S1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Urotechnology

Abstract 414
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 102
Thursday 18th September 2025
13:10 - 13:15 (ePoster Station 3)
Exhibition
Surgery New Instrumentation Voiding Dysfunction Stress Urinary Incontinence Outcomes Research Methods
1. Lady Reading Hospital-MTI, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
This is a scoping review of the available literature on paclitaxel-coated balloon dilation (DCB) in female urethral strictures. Our objectives are to map all clinical evidence on feasibility, patency rates, continence outcomes, and safety; to summarise study characteristics and patient numbers; and to identify critical knowledge gaps to inform future prospective trials.
Study design, materials and methods
We performed a scoping review following PRISMA-ScR and JBI methodology. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov) and major urology conference proceedings (2010–April 2025) were searched using “female urethral stricture” AND (“drug-coated balloon” OR “Optilume”). Inclusion criteria encompassed any clinical report—randomised or observational—of paclitaxel-coated balloon dilation in adult women with anatomical urethral stricture. Exclusion criteria were male-only cohorts, purely functional obstruction, and animal or laboratory studies. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts, then charted study design, sample size, stricture location/length, procedural details, follow-up duration, patency definition, continence outcomes, and adverse events. Data were synthesized narratively and summarised in a table; a PRISMA flow chart depicts study selection.
Results
Four unique clinical reports met inclusion criteria, comprising 28 women with postmenopausal urethral stricture treated with Optilume® DCB:
Case Reports (n=2): Single-patient descriptions with 6-month follow-up showing maintained patency and preserved sphincter function.
Conference Abstract (n=12): AUA PD05-02 series reporting early patency rates >75 % at 6–12 months with no major continence issues.
Single-Centre Cohort (n=14): Springer-published study demonstrating 91.7 % recurrence-free rate at mean 12-month follow-up and only minor balloon-related discomfort.
Follow-up ranged from 6 to 41 months. All reports used standard balloon inflation protocols (30 Fr for 5 minutes) and monitored uroflowmetry, post-void residual, and patient-reported continence. No major complications (stricture recurrence, incontinence, or urethral injury) were documented.
Interpretation of results
Although limited by small case numbers and heterogeneity in design, the consistently high short-term patency (75–92 %) and absence of serious adverse events suggest that paclitaxel-coated balloon dilation is both feasible and safe in female urethral stricture. Variability in outcome definitions and follow-up intervals, combined with lack of control groups, precludes definitive efficacy conclusions.
Concluding message
This is the first scoping review of DCB use in female urethral strictures, identifying 28 treated patients across four reports. The preliminary evidence—while encouraging—highlights the urgent need for prospective, multicentre, assessor-blinded RCTs with standardised endpoints (e.g., 12-month stricture-free rate, uroflowmetry, continence scoring) to establish high-level evidence and guide future ICS-EUS recommendations.
Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram of study selection
Figure 2
Disclosures
Funding No fund recieved Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd "This study did not require ethics committee approval because it is a review article that does not involve new data collection from human or animal subjects." Helsinki not Req'd "This study did not follow the Declaration of Helsinki in the sense that it did not involve any research on human participants, but rather synthesized previously published data; therefore, the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration were not directly applicable." Informed Consent No
16/08/2025 06:27:18