DUBAI SCORE: A NOVEL SCORING SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING THE NEED FOR TWO URETERAL STENTS IN THE SAME URETER FOR SEVERE HYDRONEPHROSIS

Elmekresh A1, Surovtseva E1, Mac Millan N1, Yusuf F1, AlYammahi A1, Aboelkheir A1, Abdul Hamid T1, Jarai M1, Azad E1, Bagheri F1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Urolithiasis

Abstract 577
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 105
Friday 19th September 2025
13:30 - 13:35 (ePoster Station 4)
Exhibition
Surgery Imaging Quality of Life (QoL) Pain, other Bladder Outlet Obstruction
1. Dubai Hospital
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Double J (DJ) ureteral stenting is widely used to manage ureteral obstruction and maintain urinary drainage. In cases of severe obstruction, long-segment fibrosis, or ureteral wall compromise, a single stent may be insufficient. Dual ureteral stenting — placing two DJ stents in the same ureter — has been proposed to optimize urine flow and prevent persistent hydronephrosis. This study aims to introduce and validate the DUBAI Score (Dual Ureteral Stenting-Based Assessment Index) as an objective system to identify patients who may benefit from dual DJ stenting.
Study design, materials and methods
This retrospective study included 20 patients with complex ureteral obstruction treated at a tertiary urology center. The DUBAI Score incorporates five clinical parameters: degree of obstruction, ureteral wall damage, length of blockage, success of single-stent attempts, and imaging findings of hydronephrosis. Each parameter is scored as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe). A cumulative score of 7 or higher indicates the need for dual stenting. Patient outcomes, including relief of obstruction, complication rates, symptom resolution, and need for reintervention, were analyzed.
Results
Patients with a DUBAI Score of 7 or higher who underwent dual stenting demonstrated superior renal drainage, faster resolution of hydronephrosis and flank pain, and improved renal function compared to single-stented patients. The complication rate was comparable between dual and single stenting. Dual stenting significantly reduced the need for repeat interventions and shortened hospital stays.
Interpretation of results
The DUBAI Score offers a standardized and practical approach for selecting patients who may benefit from dual ureteral stenting. In our cohort, dual stenting was associated with better clinical outcomes without an increased complication burden. The scoring system may reduce unnecessary interventions and optimize patient management.
Concluding message
The DUBAI Score provides an objective tool for identifying candidates for dual DJ stenting in severe ureteral obstruction cases. This approach optimizes patient outcomes and minimizes repeat procedures. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts are recommended to validate the clinical utility and generalizability of the DUBAI Score.
Disclosures
Funding None Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd Study was observational Helsinki Yes Informed Consent No
16/07/2025 16:16:55