Hypothesis / aims of study
Double J (DJ) ureteral stenting is widely used to manage ureteral obstruction and maintain urinary drainage. In cases of severe obstruction, long-segment fibrosis, or ureteral wall compromise, a single stent may be insufficient. Dual ureteral stenting — placing two DJ stents in the same ureter — has been proposed to optimize urine flow and prevent persistent hydronephrosis. This study aims to introduce and validate the DUBAI Score (Dual Ureteral Stenting-Based Assessment Index) as an objective system to identify patients who may benefit from dual DJ stenting.
Study design, materials and methods
This retrospective study included 20 patients with complex ureteral obstruction treated at a tertiary urology center. The DUBAI Score incorporates five clinical parameters: degree of obstruction, ureteral wall damage, length of blockage, success of single-stent attempts, and imaging findings of hydronephrosis. Each parameter is scored as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe). A cumulative score of 7 or higher indicates the need for dual stenting. Patient outcomes, including relief of obstruction, complication rates, symptom resolution, and need for reintervention, were analyzed.
Interpretation of results
The DUBAI Score offers a standardized and practical approach for selecting patients who may benefit from dual ureteral stenting. In our cohort, dual stenting was associated with better clinical outcomes without an increased complication burden. The scoring system may reduce unnecessary interventions and optimize patient management.