Restrictive vs. Routine Opioid Prescribing After Prolapse and Incontinence Surgeries: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Deameh M1, Amaireh E2, Ramez M3, Mohamed H4, Mohamed T5, Abdelshafi A4, Bani Irshid B6, Alattar M1, Shraim S2, Marahleh M2, Ismaiel A2

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Abstract 59
Urogynaecology 2 - Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 5
Thursday 18th September 2025
12:15 - 12:22
Parallel Hall 3
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Pain, Pelvic/Perineal Quality of Life (QoL)
1. Faculty of Medicine, Al-Balqa Applied University, As-Salt, Jordan, 2. The Specialty Hospital, Amman, Jordan, 3. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, USA, 4. Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt, 5. Urology Department, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Lincoln, UK, 6. Princess Basma Teaching Hospital, Irbid, Jordan
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Opioids are commonly prescribed for postoperative pain control after gynecologic surgeries, but many prescribed opioids often go unused, raising concerns about misuse. Restrictive opioid prescribing has proven effective in other surgical specialties, but its impact on urogynecologic surgeries remains unclear. Adequate pain control is critical for recovery and outcomes following prolapse and incontinence surgeries. However, routine opioid use carries risks such as dependence, adverse effects, and delayed recovery. Restrictive prescribing strategies aim to minimize opioid use while ensuring adequate pain control and addressing complications related to overprescription. This study hypothesizes that restrictive opioid prescribing offers similar pain control and satisfaction as routine prescribing, with reduced opioid use. The aim is to assess the effectiveness of restrictive versus routine prescribing regarding pain, satisfaction, and healthcare utilization.
Study design, materials and methods
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials was conducted to compare restrictive versus routine opioid prescribing after prolapse and incontinence surgeries. Searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to January 2025. Two independent reviewers screened and selected studies, and data were extracted on pain scores, opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, prescribing practices, and healthcare utilization. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0.
Results
This systematic review of six randomized controlled trials with a total of 922 patients found that restrictive opioid prescribing achieved pain control and patient satisfaction comparable to routine prescribing. No significant differences in satisfaction rates were observed (p > 0.05), nor was there a notable impact on healthcare utilization. However, the implementation of restrictive protocols led to a significant reduction in opioid consumption (p < 0.01). Requests for additional prescriptions were minimal and slightly more frequent in the restrictive groups. Multimodal analgesia ensured effective pain management, supporting restrictive prescribing as a safe and effective strategy to minimize opioid use.
Interpretation of results
Restrictive opioid prescribing resulted in significantly lower opioid consumption without compromising pain control or patient satisfaction. Minimal requests for additional pain medication and stable healthcare utilization suggest that restrictive protocols are both safe and effective. Multimodal analgesia played a key role in maintaining adequate pain relief.
Concluding message
Restrictive opioid prescribing is a safe and effective alternative to routine use following prolapse and incontinence surgeries. It maintains patient satisfaction and pain control while reducing opioid use and potential misuse.
Disclosures
Funding None Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd It's a systematic review Helsinki not Req'd It's a systematic review Informed Consent No
05/07/2025 13:55:55