Spinal Cord Stimulation for Functional Anorectal Pain

TAKANO S1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Anorectal / Bowel Dysfunction

Abstract 632
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 107
Saturday 20th September 2025
10:40 - 10:45 (ePoster Station 3)
Exhibition
Pain, Pelvic/Perineal Neuromodulation Retrospective Study
1. Coloproctology center Takano hospital
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
When a clinical examination and subsequent investigations fail to identify any pathological process such as anal fissure, abscess, fistula or so on, the patients with anal or rectal pain are described as having functional anorectal pain. The Rome IV diagnostic criteria for functional bowel disorders classify functional anorectal pain into chronic proctalgia and proctalgia fugax. The management of patients with functional anorectal pain can be both challenging and frustrating. Recent studies have indicated that Spinal Cord Stimulation can improve pain symptoms in patients with chronic pelvic pain.
Study design, materials and methods
Patients with functional anorectal pain were enrolled in this study after informed consent was given. At baseline, all patients underwent anal manometry and the score obtained from the visual analogue scale (VAS) was recorded. Patients were asked to evaluate the level of pain on a visual analog scale of 0 to 10. 
First Stage: Patient is placed Jack-Knife position with local anesthesia. The guide needles are inserted into the epidural space from L3-4 or L4-5. The electrodes are advanced into Th12-L1 or S3 foremen and placed. 
The nerves were stimulated using the Spinal Cord Stimulating System (Medtronic. MA, USA). This included pairs of leads with 6 electrodes. 
Second stage: The generator is implanted in the pocket under skin and the wound is closed with absorbable sutures.
Results
25 patients underwent first stage. During test stimulation, one patient complains leg pain and had removal of electrodes. 24 patients underwent second stage. 4 patients had removal of electrodes and generator because of complication as recurrence of pain and infection. The mean VAS significantly decreased from 72 to 33 (p < 0.01). An improvement of >50% in VAS was seen in 34% of the patients.
Interpretation of results
The efficacy is not enough because of more than 60% of patients had less 50% of improvement of the pain. However, this procedure is the last step for the patients with severe un-controled pain.
Concluding message
It is concluded that low-frequency stimulation therapy using a spinal cord stimulator is effective for functional anorectal pain.
Disclosures
Funding no Clinical Trial Yes Public Registry No RCT No Subjects Human Ethics Committee ERB of Coloproctology center Takano hospital Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
03/07/2025 12:05:36