Hypothesis / aims of study
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) significantly impact women's quality of life (QoL), including sexual health, with >50% experiencing female sexual dysfunction (FSD). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Altis® single-incision sling (SIS) for SUI. Additionally, it examines changes in sexual function after surgery, identifying clinical and ultrasonographic parameters potentially associated with improvement during follow-up.
Study design, materials and methods
This retrospective, monocentric study includes female patients who underwent SUI correction with the Altis® SIS. We collected data on medical history, LUTS, clinical assessments, urodynamic parameters, and questionnaires (ICIQ-SF,FSFI,FSDS,IFCI-Q,PGI-I). Surgical aspects and intra- or perioperative complications were reported. Follow-up evaluations included clinical and LUTS assessment at 1 month after surgery and pelvic floor ultrasound (US) examinations at 6 months.
Results
A total of 71 patients (mean age 59.9 ± 12.3 years) were included. The mean operative time was 25±7 minutes without intraoperative complications. 7% experienced acute urinary retention requiring temporary catheterization. At 1-month follow-up, significant improvements in LUTS and QoL were observed, with a 91.1% reduction in positive stress tests and a high PGI-I score (median 2). At the 6-month follow-up, 35 patients were re-evaluated. Among sexually active patients (n=23), a significant improvement in FSFI and FSDS scores was noted, despite a persistence of dyspareunia in 9 cases. Clinical and ultrasound parameters did not significantly differ between patients with and without postoperative FSD, except for a higher prevalence of pelvic floor overactivity (PFO) in pre- and postoperative evaluation in those reporting dyspareunia.
Interpretation of results
Our study confirms the efficacy and safety of the Altis® SIS for the surgical treatment of SUI. At short-term follow-up, patients demonstrated significant improvements in LUTS, as evidenced by the reduction in positive stress tests and a high PGI-I score. Regarding sexual function, a significant improvement in FSFI and FSDS scores among sexually active patients were observed, suggesting that SUI correction has a positive impact on female sexual health. However, 17.4% of patients reported dyspareunia postoperatively. Clinical and US evaluations did not reveal significant differences in SIS positioning, except for a higher prevalence of PFO at clinical examination, in those symptomatic. This suggests that pelvic floor dysfunction, present in pre and postoperative evaluation in this group, may play a key role in sexual discomfort.