Hypothesis / aims of study
Primary bladder neck obstruction (PBNO) is a functional disorder characterized by inadequate bladder neck opening during voiding, leading to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). It predominantly affects younger men but accounts for 4.6%–8% of female BOO cases. Diagnosis typically relies on videourodynamic studies (VUDS). Although α-blockers, botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) injections, and transurethral incision of the bladder neck (TUI-BN) are available treatments, optimal strategies, especially for women, remain uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate PBNO treatment outcomes.
Study design, materials and methods
This retrospective study included patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with PBNO by VUDS between January 2019 and January 2024. Exclusion criteria included neurological disorders, prior urological surgeries, other BOO etiologies, or incomplete follow-up within one year. Treatments comprised α-blockers, bladder neck BoNT-A injection, and TUI-BN. Outcomes were changes in uroflowmetry parameters, post-void residual (PVR) volume, and subjective symptom improvement. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, with significance set at P < 0.05.
Results
Fifty-two patients (29 females, 23 males; mean age 55.1 years) were included, treated with α-blockers (n=32), TUI-BN (n=16), or BoNT-A injection (n=4).
Among 34 patients with follow-up uroflowmetry data within three months, the TUI-BN group showed the greatest improvements in voided volume (+95.49%), Qmax (+199.07%), and mean flow rate (+197.45%), but no significant differences among groups were found (voided volume p=0.516; Qmax p=0.264; mean flow rate p=0.1).
Among 37 patients with follow-up PVR data, graded on a six-point scale, the TUI-BN group achieved the greatest PVR grade reduction (mean −0.55), followed by the α-blocker group (−0.5), while BoNT-A patients had worsened PVR (+0.75). Differences were not statistically significant (p=0.277).
Subjective symptom improvement within three months was assessed in 48 patients using a simplified Global Response Assessment (GRA) 7-point scale (−3 to +3). The mean GRA score was 1.45, with the highest score in the TUI-BN group (1.8) and the lowest in the α-blocker group (1.21), with no significant intergroup difference (p=0.086).
Interpretation of results
Although no statistically significant differences were observed among the three treatment groups, trends favored TUI-BN in both objective and subjective outcome measures. Patients undergoing TUI-BN exhibited the greatest improvements in uroflowmetry parameters, including nearly a twofold increase in Qmax and mean flow rate, suggesting enhanced bladder emptying efficiency compared to α-blockers and BoNT-A injections. Similarly, the TUI-BN group demonstrated the most substantial reduction in PVR grades, indicating better post-void bladder evacuation.
Regarding subjective symptom improvement, the highest Global Response Assessment (GRA) scores were observed in the TUI-BN group (mean 1.8), while the α-blocker group showed the lowest improvement (mean 1.21). Interestingly, the BoNT-A injection group achieved a relatively high mean GRA score of 1.75 despite minimal objective improvements. This discrepancy may reflect a stronger placebo effect associated with undergoing procedural interventions.