Comparison of the diagnostic criteria of urodynamic study for detrusor underactivity in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Yoo E S1, Kim S W1, Chung J1, Ha Y1, Choi S H1, Lee J N1, Kim H T1, Kim B S1, Kim T1, Kwon T G1, Chung S K1, Bae J H2

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Urodynamics

Abstract 326
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 21
Thursday 30th August 2018
13:30 - 13:35 (ePoster Station 1)
Exhibition Hall
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Underactive Bladder Surgery
1. Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, South Korea, 2. Department of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Presenter
E

Eun Sang Yoo

Links

Poster

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) increases with age. Detrusor underactivity (DU) is also more common in elderly patients. However, there is no standard diagnostic criterion for DU up to date. We applied various diagnostic criteria to evaluate the patients’ perspectives and the outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in patients with BPH and suspected DU. This study would contribute to give an answer to what kind of diagnostic criterion should be adopted for pre-operative evaluation of BPH surgery and prediction of prognosis in patients with BPH and DU.
Study design, materials and methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 243 patients who underwent HoLEP from May 2012 to February 2017. Ninety three patients who underwent pre-operative urodynamic study and followed-up for more than 3 months postoperatively were enrolled in the study. Preoperative evaluation included international prostate symptom score (IPSS), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), uroflowmetry, and urodynamic study. At postoperative 3 months, IPSS, uroflowmetry, and peri-operative surgical outcomes were evaluated. The diagnostic criteria for detrusor underactivity were compared using the criteria presented in the literature. Subjective and objective parameters were compared between patients who were included to each DU diagnostic criteria and those who were not.
Results
Of 93 patients, The prevalence of DU, based on each criterion [Bladder contractility index (BCI), Abrams-Griffith (AG) number criteria, pdetQmax<30 criteria, and bladder voiding efficiency (BVE) <90% criteria], was 31.2, 12.9, 11.8, and 9.7%., respectively. When patients were classified by BCI, AG number criteria, and pdetQmax<30 criteria, no significant differences were observed in changes of subjective and objective voiding symptoms between DU and control groups. However, the changes of IPSS-voiding subscore were significantly different between DU and control groups when classified by BVE<90% criteria.
Interpretation of results
BVE<90% criteria may be superior to other criteria to distinguish true DU in the patients with LUTS/BPH.
Concluding message
Our results showed that HoLEP can be a good option even in the patients with BPH and DU. This study demonstrated that BVE<90% criteria may be superior to other criteria to distinguish true DU in the patients with LUTS/BPH. This criterion can be helpful to predict the postoperative prognosis of patients with LUTS/BPH.
Disclosures
Funding None Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd This study was retrospectively performed based on the review of medical chart Helsinki Yes Informed Consent No
23/04/2024 18:49:45